Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Although Galaxy S8 is noticeably older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still much lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot lower pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Galaxy S8 has a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S8 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.