Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Even though Galaxy S8 Active is extremely older and much thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still just a little lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot lower count of pixels in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way larger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 43% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S8 Active is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.