Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a incredibly older, just a little heavier and much thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a just a little better pixel count per inch of display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way higher video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.