Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is extremely thicker and was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 2200 x 2480px resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 73 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.