Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 92.3 score against 77.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a much better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.