Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a score of 94.6 against 77.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably older, thicker and way heavier than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a quite larger screen, a just a bit better display density and a quite better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a little more money than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.