Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 90.6 score against 77.8. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also an a lot older, heavier and notably thicker cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a little bit higher count of pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.