Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | -- |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and White | Black Shadow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 91.1 score against 77.8. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 14 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Even being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition and vivo X Fold 3 Pro count with really similar processing units, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better screen than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, and although they both have a display with the same size, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has much more brightness, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with as much storage capacity for apps and games as the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, both of them have exactly the same 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition costs a bit more than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.