Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.57 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray, Purple and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 948.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 1 is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 82.6 against 77.8. The Sony Xperia 1 is a incredibly older and way thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony managed to build it lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper screen than Xperia 1, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and way more brightness.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia 1, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Xperia 1 counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia 1, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3330mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Sony Xperia 1, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Sony Xperia 1 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.