Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.18 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 10 II is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 78.5 against 77.8. The Xperia 10 II construction is incredibly lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 10 II has 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Sony Xperia 10 II, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much bigger display. The Xperia 10 II has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia 10 II, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia 10 II, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia 10 II, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.