Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-06-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 10 III is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 83.7 score against 77.8. Even though Sony Xperia 10 III is incredibly older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still much lighter. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Sony Xperia 10 III has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Xperia 10 III counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Sony Xperia 10 III, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia 10 III, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Xperia 10 III, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xperia 10 III, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a way better video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.