Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 5 II has an overall score of 87.2, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Sony Xperia 5 II's construction is notably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is way thicker and was released 4 years before. Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Sony Xperia 5 II, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher video quality, a camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
The Sony Xperia 5 II is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.