Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ Premium is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 79.8 score against 77.8. The Xperia XZ Premium is a way older and a lot thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony made it somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better screen than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a much worse pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a much larger screen and much more brightness.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a lot bigger sensor, a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a way higher video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.