Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 79 against 77.8. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, giving a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is an extremely older and way thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony was able to build it way lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a lot larger display, a way brighter display and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light photography, a lot better resolution camera and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 99 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.