Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.2 score against 77.8. The Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be told that it's also a noticeably older, a little bit heavier and a lot thicker phone. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a little lower 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much worse pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with way more brightness and a way bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a much better video definition, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 61% greater battery size.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.