Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. These phones come with Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has an older 5.1 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Xperia Z4v is extremely older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still much lighter.
Xperia Z4v counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better display than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a lot worse screen density, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a lot more megapixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 90 percent more battery size.
Sony Xperia Z4v is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.