Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. These phones come with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Vivo X60 Pro is an extremely older and a lot thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Vivo was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a quite higher display pixels density, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.