Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has an overall score of 84.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Xiaomi 14 Ultra is a better device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a a bit heavier and thicker device. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 14 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display, more screen brightness and a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rates, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.