Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though Xiaomi 14T Pro and the vivo X Fold 3 Pro were only released 6 months apart, Xiaomi 14T Pro's construction is just a bit lighter but also thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical OS features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a quite more brightness and a larger display.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro and vivo X Fold 3 Pro count with quite similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi 14T Pro has a smaller camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, a 50 MP resolution back camera and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.