Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Although Xiaomi Black Shark is older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a really bigger display and a way brighter display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos, a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.