Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.9 score against 77.8. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing you some additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is an a lot older and extremely thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to build it a bit lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a larger display, a just a little higher pixel quantity per screen inch and way more brightness. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a camera in the back with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor, a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and a lot better video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.