Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 construction is notably older, a bit heavier and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.