Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 88.3 against 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is noticeably older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has way more brightness, a larger screen, a little greater display density and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a 5700mAh battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a higher resolution back facing camera, a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.