Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 88.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-02-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black and White | Horizon blue and Midnight gray |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 88.8 against 77.8. Although the Xiaomi Mi 11 is noticeably older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 11, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, way more screen brightness and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 11 shoots clearer videos and photos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.