Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and White | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a score of 85, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite design is noticeably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is extremely thicker and was released many years before.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has much more screen brightness, a just a bit greater screen pixel density, a bigger display and a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4250mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.