Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 77.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a notably older, just a little heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen, a quite better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has better video frame rate, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.