Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-05-31 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black and White | Celestial Silver, Cosmic Black and Frosty White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11i is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 89.5 against 77.8. Xiaomi Mi 11i's body is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's incredibly thicker and was released 3 years before. Xiaomi Mi 11i features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher display pixel density, much more brightness and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11i count with very similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Mi 11i has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, it also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11i, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.