Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-06-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 56.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 has a general score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Xiaomi Mi 8's body is noticeably lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 6 years before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 8 has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a quite better pixels density and a really brighter display. The Xiaomi Mi 8 features a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.