Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a general score of 81.4, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is much older and extremely thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, offering some extra features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a way larger display, way more brightness and a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger sensor, a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a better resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.