Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is notably older and a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a just a bit higher display pixels density, a larger screen, much more brightness and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a back facing camera with more megapixels, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.