Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 has a score of 78, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Although Xiaomi Mi A2 is incredibly older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still extremely lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a really larger display, a quite better pixels density and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a lot better video quality, a much higher resolution back camera, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a much bigger camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has an 89 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.