Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 79.2 against 77.8. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi A3 is notably older and much thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still incredibly lighter. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi A3 has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a way larger screen and a higher pixel density. Xiaomi Mi A3 features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a much better video definition and a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.