Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, getting a score of 77.8 against 77.5. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a bigger display and a bit greater pixels quantity in each display inch.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution, a lot bigger camera aperture, a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos and a way higher video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 5300mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Mi Max 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.