Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 77.8. Even though the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a much larger display and a little greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more MP back facing camera and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a 68% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.