Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is notably older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a quite better pixels number in each inch of screen and a way larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a much larger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 68 percent larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.