Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is just a bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's a lot thicker and was released 6 years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a really brighter screen, a quite better pixels quantity per inch of screen, a larger screen and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.