Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black and White | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is an a lot older, just a little bit heavier and a lot thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has the older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has a quite greater pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a bit better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor, a smaller diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.