Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 83.7 against 77.8. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is an extremely older and extremely thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has a larger display, way more brightness, a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 takes clearer pictures and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5260mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.