Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a score of 77.8 against 76. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it's incredibly thinner and incredibly newer. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bit higher pixel density, a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a really bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser cores and 10 GB less RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 40 percent more battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.