Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. These devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a much thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but they weight 7.73oz.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a larger display, a much brighter display and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 21% greater battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier sensor shooting much lower quality videos and images and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.