Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and White | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 87.5 against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F4 has the older 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Poco F4's body is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is way thicker and was released around a year before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has a larger screen, way more brightness, a bit more pixels per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.