Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 78.2 against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has an older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a much older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi made it just a little bit lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a more MP camera, a much better video resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a little longer battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5700mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.