Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X2 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Poco X2 is older and a lot thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a quite higher pixels density, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a larger display. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.