Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 83.4 against 77.8. Although Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is noticeably older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a bigger screen and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has a back camera with more mega pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.