Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 78.2 against 77.8. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a way older and a lot thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to build it a little lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi 9T has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a just a little greater pixel number in each display inch, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5700mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.