Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 78.3 score against 77.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's noticeably thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a larger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a lot brighter display and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has a bigger aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.