Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a incredibly older and extremely thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi made it somewhat lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a just a little greater pixel number in each inch in the screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a larger display and much more display brightness.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.