Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 91.5 against 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has the older 12 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is an older and thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a bigger display, a little better pixel number in each screen inch, a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and way more brightness. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.