Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 80.3 against 77.8. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is noticeably older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit better display density. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos, a better resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.