Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 77.8 score against 76.6. These phones come with Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features and better performance. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's way thinner and incredibly newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a little better count of pixels per inch of screen, a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a more MP camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5020mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.